Depend On The Government For Your Health Care? Good Luck…
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists
The vote is done and we have awakened to a new era. Under the guise of coverage for pre-existing conditions and the security of knowing that you can’t be kicked off your insurance when you really need it, the democrats have pushed through a bill which will lead to the end of health care as we know it.
Read more… at BigGovernment.com — http://biggovernment.com/egeorge/2010/03/23/depend-on-the-government-for-your-health-care-good-luck/

20 Ways Obamacare Will Take Away Your Freedom
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists
Read full article at: http://blogs.investors.com/capitalhill/index.php/home/35-politicsinvesting/1563-20-ways-obamacare-will-take-away-our-freedoms

Starting Today, the Best Health Care System in the World is History
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Rush Limbaugh, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists

| The sobering opening monologue on the morning after. |
| Starting Today, the Best Health Care System |
| Rationed care and total dependence on government.
Read full article at: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_032210/content/01125106.guest.html |

Inside the Pelosi Sausage Factory
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists, Taxed To Death
News Link • Healthcare Inside the Pelosi Sausage Factory 03-22-2010 • The Wall Street Journal Kimberly Strassel outlines the dirty deals, open threats, broken promises and disregard for democracy that pulled ObamaCare to this point, and how the same machinations pushed it across the finish line. |
||||||
Read full article at: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/066495-2010-03-22-inside-the-pelosi-sausage-factory.htm

Michael Savage on Obamacare Socialized Medicine
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Michael Savage, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists

The Huffington Post Exposes Obamacare Lies
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists
News Link • Healthcare THE HUFFINGTON POST EXPOSES OBAMACARE LIES 03/20/2010 • godlikeproductions.com Fact Sheet: The Truth About the Health Care Bill The Firedoglake health care team has been covering the debate in congress since it began last year. The health care bill will come up for a vote in the House on Sunday, and as Nancy Pelosi works to |
||||||
Read full article at: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/066419-2010-03-20-the-huffington-post-exposes-obamacare-lies.htm
Here’s some facts from the US Dept of Health and Human Services — these facts show that Obamacare is a health-insurance welfare program for illegal aliens.
The Uninsured by Citizenship Status
The vast majority (79%) of the uninsured are citizens. However, a disproportionate percentage of the uninsured are non-citizens. While non-citizens are 7% of the population, they are 21% of the uninsured. Non-citizens are a disproportionate percentage of the uninsured because they are more likely to have characteristics associated with higher uninsured rates. Non-citizens are more likely than citizens to:
- be Hispanic (59% vs. 12%),
- have incomes below 200% FPL (51% vs. 30%),
- be young adults age 18 to 34 (42% vs. 22%), and

Michelle Bachmann on Michael Savage — IRS Will Enforce Health Care — Fascist Obamacare?
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Michelle Bachmann, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists

John Boehner (R-OH) — Americans Want Nothing To Do With Obamacare
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists

Washington Times Editorial: Impeach the President?
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist
Mr. Obama is willing to devour his presidency, his party’s congressional majority and – most disturbing – our democratic institutional safeguards to enact it. He is a reckless ideologue who is willing to sacrifice the country’s stability in pursuit of a socialist utopia.
See complete article at: http://www.prisonplanet.com/washington-times-editorial-impeach-the-president.html

Michael Savage — Soviet America
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Socialist Obama set to “Slaughter” Healthcare
Filed under: Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists
“Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.”
– Ayn Rand
News Link • Philosophy: Conservatism Obama set to “Slaughter” Healthcare 03/17/2010 • Uncommon Sense As reported in this blog on many occasions in the past year the “progressive left” has treated the United States Constitution with both disregard and disdain. The President himself has said, “But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of |
||||||
See complete article at: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/066307-2010-03-17-obama-set-to-slaughter-healthcare.htm

Paul Ryan Speaks Out Against The Slimy Democrats — ramming Socialized Medicine Down Our Throats
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists

“We” — The Democrat-Socialists’ Most Vicious Word
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists, The Global Warming Fraud
Listening to Obama, Pelosi, and the other radical socialists in Congress is like listening to speeches by Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez. The socialist-Democrats always keep repeating their most vicious word, “we,” to justify ramming their socialist ‘paradise’ and socialized medicine down our throats.
Here’s some typical policies the Democrat-socialists-marxists suggest:
“We” need to give health care to all people (including millions of illegal aliens) with a “non-profit” socialized-medicine system (the same system that wrecked medical care in England and Canada?, and paid for by whom?).
“We” need to give all kids tuition money for a college education (a socialist, anti-American-values education presided over by Marxist professors?, and paid for by whom?).
“We” need pre-school for all children from age two years old, especially minority kids (with or without the consent of parents?, and paid for by whom?).
“We” need “parent education” programs to teach parents how to raise their kids (the parent-police in Hillary Clinton’s “village” that “raises” children).
“We” need more federal programs to cure AIDS, for AIDS education, and to pay for drug addicts’ needles (why should we pay for other people’s drug habits and unprotected sex that cause most of the AIDS?).
“We” need to spend more billions of dollars on government (public) schools (that’s like throwing money down a toilet).
“We” need to spend billions of dollars to solve global warming (human-caused global warming is a deliberate hoax designed to destroy our liberty and free economy).
“We” have to take money from the oil companies to fund alternative energy programs (yes, “take” is what Hillary Clinton said in a previous speech. “Take,” as in “loot”).
“We” have to raise taxes on the “rich” to pay for all these multi-billion dollar programs (which kills the goose that lays the golden egg—it’s the productive “rich” who create the jobs the poor depend on).
“We” have to end the imbecile Iraq war that is bankrupting us. But, God forbid, we will NOT give the billions of dollars we spend on the war back to you, the taxpayers. We’ll keep your money and give it away to every petty looter and special-interest group who’ll vote us into office.
“We” have to stop companies from moving overseas and not paying heavy corporate taxes (companies want to run from strangling US taxes and regulations — why shouldn’t they?).
“We” have to tax the rich (who earned their money) to pay for welfare, farm subsidies, employment programs for minorities, and dozens of other giveaway programs (why should these people get unearned handouts they didn’t work for?).
“We” have to make sure the “rich” pay their “fair share” of taxes (“fair share” means to loot money from brilliant, productive businessmen who earn more than others with their superior ambition and hard work, and give this stolen loot to less productive people who do not produce jobs for others).
In their quest to ram their socialist-fascist ‘paradise’ down our throats, they turn their Castro-Chavez collectivist “we” into their religion — “We” have to help this group. “We” have to help that group. “We” have to raise taxes or take money from the “rich” to pay for all this looting.
“We” is the Democrat-socialists’ killer word. They mean that “we” are our brothers’ keeper, whether we like it or not. “We” must sacrifice our lives, our work, our hard-earned money to pay for any looters who want to take our money, courtesy of government-elected thieves.
“We” is an attempt to make you forget the word “I,” as in “I” earned my money and “you” don’t have a right to take it from me.
The Democrat-socialist looters all claim the right to tax us to death to pay for uninsured people’s health care (including illegal aliens), unemployment insurance that never ends, farm subsidies, corporate subsidies and bailouts, welfare mothers, congenitally-incompetent public schools, unbelievable government-worker pensions, and every other whining special-interest group who demands government hand-outs at your expense.
Let’s be clear on one thing. You are NOT your brother’s keeper, and no government you elect has the right to force you to be. “Compassion” enforced at the end of a government gun (taxes) is naked compulsion. Every program that looting liberals promote with their “we” forces you to be your brother’s keeper, whether you like it or not. In effect, Democrat-socialists tell you, “your money or your life.”
There is only one way to fight the Democrat-socialists’ vicious moral notion that “we” are our brother’s keeper. Like a prayer, keep repeating the words that you have the God-given right to keep every cent you earn. Your property is not someone else’s “resource” to spend as they please. Liberal looters who spout their “we” think your hard-earned money is theirs for the taking. They think of you as an expendable sacrificial animal. They think that your duty is to work for the money, but they have the right to spend it.
To fight the socialist looters, keep repeating like a prayer, “My money and property are mine—I earned it. No politician I elect has the right to steal my money to give away to others.” It’s as simple as that.
If you accept the Democrat-socialists’ deadly “we,” you fall into their trap. You accept the vicious socialist and fascist moral notion that you are your brother’s keeper. You accept the notion that the people you elect to office have the right to loot your hard-earned money to enforce that notion. You accept the fact that those you elect to office have the right to make you into a slave—to work your whole life for the benefit of others.
Only when you reject this moral doctrine, only when you reject the Obama socialists’ “we,” will you elect to office people who will respect your life, your money, your property, and your liberty.
In the November elections, you have a chance to put these socialists on the unemployment line, where they belong.
by Joel Turtel

Obama Pushes Anti-Gun Treaty
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

International Effort to Grab Your Guns — Thanks to Socialist Obama
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Still Think Obamacare Won’t Have “Health-care” Death Panels? — Listen To The Words Of Obama’s Own Advisor
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Michelle Bachmann, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists

Obama Plans 10MM Acre Land Grab — Environmental fascism
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, The Global Warming Fraud
News Link • ![]()
Property Rights
Obama Plans 10MM Acre Land Grab
03/06/2010 • Uncommon Sense
As I have warned in previous posts the agenda to “fundamentally transform America” is following the Cloward/Piven handbook of community organizing. While the attention of the nation is focused on the health care debate, the administration has multiple . . . ![]()
Dave Johannes
See full article at: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/065887-2010-03-06-obama-plans-10mm-acre-land-grab.htm

Michelle Bachman on Pelosi Health-Care Bill — “This Is the Crown Jewel of Socialism”
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists

Ron Paul on Tyranny in America
Filed under: Americans Finally Waking Up, Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Cap and Trade Will Destroy the Middle Class
Filed under: Americans Finally Waking Up, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Taxed To Death

“We” — The liberal-socialist-Democrats’ Most Vicious Word
Filed under: Eco-Radicals, Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists
The liberals-socialists-Democrats’ favorite and most vicious word is “We.” Here’s some typical policies the Democrat-looters want to ram down our throats:
“We” need to give health care to all people with a “non-profit” socialized-medicine system (the same system that wrecked medical care in England and Canada?, and paid for by whom?).
“We” need to give all kids tuition money for a college education (a socialist, anti-American-values education presided over by Marxist professors?, and paid for by whom?).
“We” need pre-school for all children from age two years old, especially minority kids (with or without the consent of parents?, and paid for by whom?).
“We” need “parent education” programs to teach parents how to raise their kids (the parent-police in Hillary Clinton’s “village” that “raises” children).
“We” need more federal programs to cure AIDS, for AIDS education, and to pay for drug addicts’ needles (why should we pay for other people’s drug habits and unprotected sex that cause most of the AIDS?).
“We” have to raise taxes on the “rich” to pay for all these multi-billion dollar programs (which kills the goose that lays the golden egg—it’s the productive “rich” who create the jobs the poor depend on).
“We” need to spend more billions of dollars on government (public) schools (that’s like throwing money down a toilet).
“We” need to spend billions of dollars to solve global warming (human-caused global warming is a deliberate hoax designed to destroy our liberty and free economy).
“We” have to take money from the oil companies to fund alternative energy programs (yes, “take” is what Hillary Clinton said in a previous speech. “Take,” as in “loot”).
“We” have to end the Iraq and Afghanistan wars that are bankrupting us. But, God forbid, we will NOT give the billions of dollars we spend on the wars back to you, the taxpayers. We’ll keep your money and give it away to Wall Street bankers, illegal aliens (free health care), and every ‘entitlement’ looter and special-interest group who’ll vote us into office.
“We” have to stop companies from moving overseas and not paying heavy corporate taxes (companies want to run from strangling US taxes and regulations — why shouldn’t they?).
“We” have to tax the rich (who earned their money) to pay for welfare, farm subsidies, employment programs for minorities, and dozens of other giveaway programs (why should these people get unearned handouts they didn’t work for?).
“We” have to make sure the “rich” pay their “fair share” of taxes (“fair share” means to loot money from brilliant, productive businessmen who earn more than others with their superior ambition and hard work, and give this stolen loot to less productive people who do not produce jobs for others).
And on and on the liberal looters go — “We” have to help this group. “We” have to help that group. “We” have to raise taxes or take money from the “rich” to pay for all this looting.
“We” is the liberal-socialist-Democrat’s killer word. They mean that “we” are our brothers’ keeper, whether we like it or not. “We” must sacrifice our lives, our work, our hard-earned money to pay for any looters who want to take our money, courtesy of government-elected thieves.
“We” is an attempt to make you forget the word “I,” as in “I” earned my money and “you” don’t have a right to take it from me.
The Democrat-liberal-socialist looters in Congress and the White House all claim the right to tax us to death to pay for uninsured people’s health care (including Mexican illegal aliens), unemployed peoples’ training, tenured-teachers unearned pay raises, congenitally-incompetent public schools’ unending failure, government workers who get rich on these programs, and every other whining special-interest group who demands government hand-outs at your expense.
Let’s be clear on one thing. You are NOT your brother’s keeper, and no government you elect has the right to force you to be. “Compassion” enforced at the end of a government gun (taxes) is naked compulsion. Every program that looting liberals promote with their “we” forces you to be your brother’s keeper, whether you like it or not. In effect, Democrats tell you, “your money or your life.”
There is only one way to fight the liberal-socialist-Democrats’ vicious moral notion that “we” are our brother’s keeper. Like a prayer, keep repeating the words that you have the God-given right to keep every cent you earn. Your property is not someone else’s “resource” to spend as they please. Liberal looters who spout their “we” think your hard-earned money is theirs for the taking. They think of you as an expendable sacrificial animal. They think that your duty is to work for the money, but they have the right to spend it.
To fight the liberal looters, keep repeating like a prayer, “My money and property are mine—I earned it. No politician I elect has the right to steal my money to give away to others.” That, and voting every liberal-looter Democrat out of office come November.
If you accept the liberal Democrats’ deadly “we,” you fall into their trap. You accept the vicious socialist and fascist moral notion that you are your brother’s keeper. You accept the notion that the people you elect to office have the right to loot your hard-earned money to enforce that notion. You accept the fact that those you elect to office have the right to make you into a slave—to work your whole life for the benefit of others.
Only when you reject this moral doctrine, only when you reject the vicious liberals’ “we,” will you elect people to office who will respect your life, your money, your property, and your liberty.
by Joel Turtel

Health-care Rationing and Death-Lists Coming Your Way — Marxist Obama’s Plan For Your Family
Filed under: Americans Finally Waking Up, Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists
My fellow-Americans — if you don’t want “health-care” death lists for your family, I urge you to contact your Congressman and Senator NOW, and tell them you will vote them out of office next election if they vote for Obama’s socialized-medicine death lists and rationing. Tell them you will tell every friend, relative, neighbor, or fellow-worker to vote then out of office if they vote for this marxist health-care plan. Act now before it’s too late.

Michael Savage — Obama the Marxist Disaster

Michael Savage — Obama’s Communist “Environment” Agenda — Coming Your Way
Filed under: Americans Finally Waking Up, Eco-Radicals, Michael Savage, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Funny video — The Government Can!
Filed under: Americans Finally Waking Up, Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Health Care Is Not a Right — Leonard Peikoff
Filed under: Obama -- Radical Socialist, Socialized Medicine -- Death Lists

Michael Savage — Obama Government Avalanche – Dictator Ruling for the Masses

ObamaYouth Indoctrination School
Filed under: Obama -- Radical Socialist, Public School Disaster

Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, And The “Robber Barrons”
Marxist college professors diligently teach their soon-to-be-brainwashed students a bedtime scare-story about the free-market called “the robber barrons,” the allegedly ‘evil’ ones that represent the epitome of ‘true” free-market capitalism in the raw.
Let’s point out a few facts about these alleged “robber-barrons.” The really “bad” robber-barrons were not free-market producers, but instead were in league with, and depended on government contracts and influence to get them special monopoly privileges to destroy their competition. The classic example was the Union Pacific Railroad, and the railroad that created a near-monopoly in California and other western states in the last half of the 19th century.
These corporations bribed Congress to get monopolies for their railroad lines. In league with corrupt state and Federal government regulators, they were able to EXCLUDE other railroads from competing with them. After they got their government-created monopoly set up, they then proceeded to gouge farmers on freight rates, hence gaining the hatred of farmers and small business owners, and earning the name of “robber barrons”.
However, there was a different brand of productive producer who never took a dime of government money, and never tried to exlude competition by using Government regulations and bribing government officials to give them monopolies over their competition. James J. Hill, president of the Great Northern Railroad created a superlative railroad in the northwest states without any corrupting relationship with government regulators. He beat the competition with his competence and by giving farmers and other shippers a superb railroad at fair shipping prices. Moreover, he HAD to give farmers fair-market shipping prices, because he had fierce competition by other railroads. And that is the primary point here.
Most of the “robber-barrons” who earned that reputation were just like today’s corporations that get special privilages from government regulations that help to strangle their competition, which then allows them to gouge consumers with high prices for their products. A classic example are the thousands of local electric and gas utility companies that get monopoly privilages from the cities they operate in.
Let’s talk about one of the so-called “robber-barrons” and his “evil” accomplishments, John D. Rockefeller. Rockefeller, due to his superb efficiency as a businessman and oil producer and refiner, managed to reduce the price of kerosene (used to light lamps at night before we had electric lights), from about $1.50 a gallon to less than 30 cents a gallon by the 1920’s. What Rockefeller accomplished was to give Americans the night back. The vast majority of Americans were now able to afford cheap kerosene to light their lamps at night, so they didn’t have to go to bed in the dark after the sun went down, or depend on candles, or (horror of horrors) whale oil, almost making whales an, hold on to your hat, endangered species.
It seems that besides Rockefeller giving most Americans the ability to read books and stay up to at night with cheap kerosene lighting, he also saved the whales (eco-freaks rejoice!). That’s besides literally creating the oil and refining industry that we have today that employs millions of Americans, lights their houses at the flick of a switch, and drives their cars, refrigerators, and iPods. If this is ‘evil,’ then we desperately need more men like Rockefeller to get us out of the hole that Obama is putting us in.
A more modern example of a true government-created “robber-barron” was the stranglehold monopoly on long-distance telephone service held for over 20 years by AT&T. WHY did they have such a monopoly where they could charge us $1.50 a minute for a long-distance calls? It was because Federal government regulators GAVE them that monopoly by legally forbidding other competitors. The same goes today for the US Post Office. They are a governement-created monopoly on 1st class mail service, and the Federal government has SHUT DOWN the few competitors over the years who tried to create competing first-class delivery service.
So liberal-socialists, who probably love their Blackberry or iPods created by the “evil” capitalists at Microsoft or Apple, unhappily continue to mouth their marxist college professors’ rhetoric, and attack this straw man of the free-market called “robber-barrons,” to ‘prove’ the “evil” of the unfettered free-market. But in fact, they don’t condemn an unfettered capitalism as it could and should be, but the mongrel “mixed” economy, the hybrid monster of government controls and government regulators in league with corrupt corporations who are eager to use government to crush their competition. This mongrel, quasi-socialist/fascist system we now have in America, is NOT free-market capitalism, but simply a half-way house to the final abyss of a socialist/fascist America.
A true free-market would have a constitutional Amendment that created a wall between government and the economy (similar to the separation of Church and State). Congress would be forbidden from making any laws or regulations that gave special monopoly privileges, subsidies, or handouts to any business, corporation, or special-interest group (such as unions). In a true free market, free from all government controls or interference, a business would only succeed because of their competence, and how well they beat their competitors in providing the highest quality and/or lowest-priced products or services for their customers.
Every day, our liberal/socialist/marxist friends benefit from that free-market they so blithly attack. Yet, let them turn on a switch, and they immediately gets light in their rooms. Let them go to a local gas station, and they easily get fuel to drive their cars. WHERE do liberal/socialists think they get these wonderful things that give them their high standard of living? WHO do they think brings them all these marvelous goods and services that makes their lives so easy — why, from the “evil” capitalists who they like to tax to death.
Have our fuzzy liberal/socialists ever seen recent videos of the streets and cars running around Havana today? Cuba looks like a time-warp from the 1950s. Not an ounce of progress, new buildings, new cars, or a better life for its citizens. It’s as if Castro’s socialist “paradise” stopped the clock of human progress in Cuba, as it has. Is this what fuzzy liberal-socialists want for themselves and THEIR children?
Besides going to Cuba to test out the socialized-medicine paradise there, perhaps fuzzy liberal/socialists should travel back in time a few hundred years before we HAD those “evil” free-market capitalists they call “robber barrons.” Let them risk dying at average age 47 instead of the average age of 79 that Americans die today, because the “evil” capitalists at our supermarket chains, pharmaceutical companies, and water-treatment corporations now give us fresh, abundant food, antibiotics, and sanitary drinking water. Let them live in a log cabin they have to light with candles or whale oil at night. Let them have to risk their lives hunting for their food, instead of so conveniently being able to go to their local supermarkets for milk and steaks. Let them ride their cows or horses a hundred miles to town, rather than getting in their shiny cars that take them to their shiny city restaurant in a few minutes.
Liberals like to deny that they are like those bad ’socialists’ we used to have in the Soviet Union or in communist Cuba today, and all liberal-socialists shout that they hate ‘fascists.’ Sorry to burst your bubble, liberals, but there’s very little difference between a liberal, socialist, or a fascist. Liberals, if they ever get around to reading recent history, might discover that the German NAZI party stood for “National SOCIALIST” party of Germany. Yes, horror of horrors, the Nazis were primarily socialists, with a national German twist. They were for complete government control of all industries. So are socialists. They were for heavy, progressive income taxes, the same as socialists and Communists. They claimed that the individual must sacrifice himself to the “Fatherland.” Socialists in Cuba and the Soviet Union claimed that the people must sacrifice themselves to “the people.” That’s simply the same vicious socialist-collectivist notion with a different name.
Both socialists and fascists believe government should either own or totally control the economic activity and political freedom of all its citizens, in effect making them slaves of the state. Socialism and fascism are simply two sides of the same vicious coin, brothers under the skin. They espouse the same philosophy that has been responsible for murdering and torturing over 100 million people in the 20th century (by Hitler, Stalin Mao, Castro, ad nauseum). Yet fuzzy liberal/socialists still desperately cling to their woolly beliefs in the “goodness” of socialism, vs. the “evil” of the free-market that has brought them a standard of living and health care that they couldn’t even dream of in a socialist-fascist ‘paradise’ like Cuba.
Fuzzy liberal-socialists likes to see themselves as a lovers of humanity. They, unlike ‘evil’ capitalists and Republicans, “care” about people. If that’s the case, why would they embrace a philosophy responsible for the murder and torture of over 100 million people in the 20th century, and which continues to murder, torture, and starve to death tens of millions of people in Cuba, soon Venezuala, China, and dozens of other socialist-fascist “paradises” in Africa, Burma, etc., etc.?
Fuzzy socialists claim they want to “help” others, but with WHOSE money? It’s so easy to be “noble” with other people’s money. It’s so easy to “help” others by robbing millions of Americans of their hard-earned money with taxes, to then “redistirbute” (Obama’s marxist term) this stolen money to other looters who keep voting the Obama’s of this world into office.
If fuzzy liberal-socialists want to truly ‘help’ others, why don’t they donate 95% of THEIR personal income and “redistribute” THEIR money to the starving masses of Africa, Cuba, and other socialist/fascist paradises around the world? After all, I’m sure most liberals make far more money than poor people forced to live under a socialist-fascist regime. If liberal-socialists truly want to help humanity, let them PUT THEIR MONEY WHERE THEIR MOUTHS ARE, rather than promoting a vicious socialist system that let’s government looters take the earnings from productive average Americans to “redistribute” to welfare mothers, millions of illegal aliens, and hundreds of other special-interest groups who never earned that handout money?
Most of our well-fed liberal-socialists don’t give away all THEIR money to the poor and downtrodden in Africa or Appalachia, do they? So where is their true love for humanity and those less fortunate than themselves? Or are they simply vicious hypocrites who presume they have the right to spend OTHER people’s money so they can boast that they are lovers of humanity?

Michael Savage — The Communist Revolution Going on in America
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Michael Savage, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Barack Obama Kids And Hitler Youth Sing For Their Leader
Filed under: Obama -- Radical Socialist, Public School Disaster
This is really scary, folks. Parents — is your public school feeding your kids this Obama propaganda?

Chairman Obama Is Running A “Gangster” Government
Filed under: Americans Finally Waking Up, Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Michael Savage – September 11, 2009 — Are You an American? Are You Safe Anymore?
Filed under: Americans Finally Waking Up, Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Obama 2001 Interview: His Socialist/Marxist, Welfare-State Agenda
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Dr. Alan Keyes – “Obama is a Radical Communist – Will Destroy America!”
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Senate Bill Lets Obama Shut Down the Internet
Filed under: Americans Finally Waking Up, Obama -- Radical Socialist

Socialists and Fascists — Brothers Under The Skin
Filed under: Land Of The Free?, Obama -- Radical Socialist, Taxed To Death
Let’s talk for a minute about Marxist college professor’s favorite children’s bedtime scare-story about the free-market — the “robber barrons,” the “evil” ones that represent the epitome of free-market capitalism in the raw. There are several books I can refer fuzzy socialists to that explain the real history of capitalism in this country, but let me just point out a few facts about the “robber-barrons.”
The really “bad” robber-barrons of the late 19th century were the same as the corporations taking handouts and subsidies today. They were in league with, and depended on government contracts and handouts to gain them special monopoly privilages to destroy their competition. The classic example were the the railroads that created a near-monopoly in California and other western states in the last half of the 19th century.
These railroad corporations got Congress to give them monopolies for railroad freight and agricultural product freight. In league with corrupt state and Federal government regulators, they were able to EXCLUDE other railroads from competing with them. After they got their government-created monopolies set up, they then proceeded to gouge farmers on freight rates, hence gaining the hatred of farmers and small business owners, and earning the name of ”robber barrons”.
However, there was a different kind of productive corporation who never took a dime of government money, and never tried to exlude competition by using Government regulations and bribing government officials to give them monopolies over their competition. James J. Hill, president of the Great Northern Railroad created a superlative railroad in the northwest states without any corrupting relationship with government regulators. He beat the competition with his competence and by giving farmers and other shippers a superb railroad with fair shipping prices. Moreover, he HAD to give farmers fair-market shipping prices, because he had fierce competition by other railroads. And that is the primary point here. Fierce free-market competition protects consumers. Government-created monopolies are the true “robber-barrons.”
Let’s talk about another so-called “robber-barron” and his “evil” accomplishments, John D. Rockefeller. Rockefeller, due to his superb efficiency as a businessman and oil producer and refiner, managed to reduce the price of kerosene (used to light lamps at night before we had electric lights), from about $1.50 a gallon to less than 30 cents a gallon by the 1920’s. What Rockefeller accomplished was to give Americans the night back. The vast majority of Americans were now able to afford cheap kerosene to light their lamps at night, so they didn’t have to go to bed in the dark after the sun went down, or depend on candles, or (horror of horrors) whale oil, almost making whales an endangered species.
Gee, it seems that besides Rockefeller giving most Americans the ability to read books at night, work at night indoors, and stay up at night with cheap kerosene fuel, he also saved the whales (eco-freaks rejoice!). That’s really evil. That’s besides literally creating the oil and refining industry that we have today that employs millions of Americans, lights their houses at night, drives their cars, refrigerators, and iPods. Yes, what an evil “robber-barron” he was.
A more modern classic example of a true government-created “robber-barron” was the stranglehold monopoly on long-distance telephone service held by AT&T for over 20 years. WHY did AT&T have a monopoly where they could charge customers $1.50 a minute for long-distance calls, where now, after the AT&T monopoly was broken up, fierce competition has driven down the price of long-distance calls to less than 10 cents a minute? It was because Federal government regulators GAVE them that monopoly by legally forbidding other competitors.
The same goes today for the US Post Office. They are a government-created monopoly on 1st class mail service, and the Federal government has SHUT DOWN the few competitors over the years who tried to create cheaper, more efficient, competing first-class delivery service.
Yet fuzzy socialists out there, who probably every day use their Blackberry or iPods created by the “evil” capitalists at Microsoft or Apple, unhappily continue to mouth their Marxist college professors’ rhetoric, and attack this straw-man of the free-market called “robber-barrons” to prove the “evil” of the unfettered free-market.
But in fact, they condemn not unfettered capitalism as it could and should be, but the mongrel “mixed” socialist economy we have today in America, the hybrid monster of government corruption and government regulators in league with corrupt corporations who are eager for government subsidies, handouts (does the word TARP come to mind?), and “partnerships.”
This mongrel, quasi- socialist/fascist system we now have in America, is NOT free-market capitalism, but simply a half-way house to the final abyss of a socialist/fascist America, an America I don’t think that even fuzzy socialists will like, once we get there.
Fuzzy socialists are always slamming the free-market (meaning economic freedom), yet every day they personally benefit from this free-market they so blithly attack. Let them turn on a light switch, and they immediately get light in their living rooms. Let them go to a local gas station, and they easily get fuel to drive their cars. WHERE do fuzzy socialists think they get these wonderful things that allow them to live with electric lights, rather than by candle light, and have the luxury and freedom of a car driven by gasoline taken from the Arabian desert and brought conveniently to their local gas station?
They get all these marvelous benefits of their easy life from the “evil” capitalists who bring them all these wonderful goods and services. Have fuzzy socialists ever seen videos of the streets, and cars running around Havana today? Cuba looks like a time-warp from the 1950s. Not an ounce of progress, new buildings, new cars, or a better life for its citizens. It’s as if Castro’s socialist “paradise” stopped the clock of human progress in Cuba, as it has. Is THIS what fuzzy Socialists truly want for themselves and THEIR families and children in America?
Besides going to Cuba to test out the socialized-medicine paradise there, perhaps fuzzy socialists should travel back in time a few hundred years before we HAD those “evil” free-market capitalists they call “robber barrons.” Let them risk dying at average age 47 instead of the average age of 79 that Americans die today, because the “evil” capitalists at our supermarket chains, pharmaceutical companies, and water-treatment corporations gave us fresh, abundant food, antibiotics, and sanitary drinking water.
Let them live in a log cabin that they light with candles or whale oil at night. Let them have to risk their lives to hunt for food, instead of so conveniently going to their local supermarkets for milk and bread. Let them ride their cows or horses a hundred miles to town, rather than getting in their shiny cars that take them to their shiny city restaurants in a few minutes.
I went to college many years ago, when our colleges were not so completely filled to the brim with Marxist college professors who kept repeating the scary bedtime story of “robber barrons” and “evil” capitalists. So luckily I managed to get an education without too much socialist propaganda.
In that education, and subsequently, I learned that there’s very little difference between a socialist and a fascist. If fuzzy Socialists ever learned true historical facts, they might find out that the NAZI party stood for “National SOCIALIST” party of Germany. Yes, horror of horrors, the Nazis were primarily socialists, with a national German twist. They were for complete government control of all industries. So are socialists. They were for heavy, progressive income taxes, the same as socialists and Communists. They claimed that the individual must sacrifice himself to the “Fatherland”. Socialists in Cuba and the Soviet Union claimed that their citizens/slaves must sacrifice themselves to “the people”. That’s simply the same vicious socialist-collectivist notion with a different name. Both socialists and fascists believe government should either own or totally control the economic activity and political freedom of all its citizens, in effect making them slaves of the state.
Socialism and fascism are simply two sides of the same vicious coin, brothers under the skin. They espouse the same anti-human philosophy that has been responsible for murdering over 100 million people in the 20th century (by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro, ad nauseum). Yet fuzzy Socialists still cling to their woolly beliefs in the “goodness” of Socialism, vs. the “evil” of the free-market that has brought them a standard of living and health care they couldn’t even dream of in the socialist or socialist-fascist paradises in Cuba or North Korea today.
Fuzzy socialists like to see themselves as lovers of humanity. They “care” about people. Gee, if that’s the case, why would they embrace a philosophy responsible for the murder and torture of over 100 million people in the 20th century, and which continues to murder, torture, and starve to death tens of millions of people in Cuba, soon Venezuala, China, and dozens of other socialist-fascist “paradises” in Africa, Burma, etc., etc.?
Fuzzy socialists claim they want to “help” others, but with WHOSE money (not theirs!)? It’s so easy to be “noble” with other people’s money. It’s so easy to “help” others by robbing millions of Americans of their hard-earned money with taxes, to then “redistirbute” (Obama’s marxist term) this stolen money to other fuzzy little looter-socialists who keep voting the Obama’s of this world into office.
If fuzzy socialists wants to truly help “others”, why don’t they donate 95% of THEIR personal income, and “redistribute” THEIR money to the poor starving masses of Africa, Cuba, and other socialist or socialist/fascist countries around the world? After all, I’m sure fuzzy socialists make far more money than these poor people forced to live under a socialist-fascist “paradise.”
If fuzzy socialists truly want to help humanity, let them PUT THEIR MONEY WHERE THEIR MOUTHS ARE, rather than promoting a vicious socialist system that lets government looters take the earnings from productive average Americans to “redistribute” to every lousy little looter/parasite who thinks the world owes them a living? Do I hear silence out there from our fuzzy socialists? Fuzzy socialists don’t want to give all THEIR money to the poor and downtrodden in Africa? Where is their true love for humanity?
by Joel Turtel

Rush Defends The “You Lie!” Outburst against Obama, The Pathological Liar
Filed under: Obama -- Radical Socialist, Rush Limbaugh

Fascist-Socialist Obama Is The Disaster Ayn Rand Was Predicting

Michael Savage — New World Order Puppets — From Bush to Obama
Filed under: Michael Savage, Obama -- Radical Socialist





